Paracas Cavernas and Chavin

  • Alfred L. Kroeber University of California-Berkeley, California, USA
Keywords: Archeology, Paracas, Chavín

Abstract

In a recent review and critique of the Chavín Problem (1), Gordon Willey has listed seventeen ancient Peruvian sites whose remains indisputably affiliate stylistically with the type site oí Chavín de Huántar. Beyond these, he reviews a greater number of sites for which relationship with Chavín has been alleged. These he puts into three classes: 1, No evidence has been presented for the relationship; 2, There is evidence, but it shows similarities in cultural inventory or context, not of the characteristic Chavín Style; 3, Evidence is available but debatable. In this last class Willey puts the Paracas Cavernas pottery of Paracas and Ocucaje. He sees in its dark-ware, flat-bottomed, incised bowls ( 2 ) close similarity with Ancón and Supe Chavín bowls; but this similarity is balanced by the dissimilarities of [a] most of Cavernas cerramics being polychrome, and [b] others being negatively painted (3), a technique never or rarely ocurring in a Chavín context. As for an intised and painted fanged cat-face from Ocucaje, (4) it "lacks the characteristis Chavín rendering".

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Métricas alternativas

References

Bennett, W. C., 1939. Archaeology of the North Coast of Peru. Anthr. Pap. Am. Mus. Natural Hist., 37: 1-153.

Bennett, W. C., 1944. The North Highlands of Peru. Same, 39: 1-114.

Bennett, W. C., 1946. The Archeology of the Central Andes, pp. 61-147 of Bur. Am. Ethnol. Bull. 143, Handbook of S. Am. Indians, 2: The Andean Civilizations.

Bennett, W. C., and Bird J. B., 1949. Andean Culture History. Am. Mus. Natural Hist., Handbook Series N°. 15. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.68334

Carrión Cachot, Rebeca, 1931. La Indumentaria en la Antigua Cultura de Paracas. Wira Kocha, 1: 37-86, pls. 1-2, figs. 1-22.

Carrión Cachot, Rebeca, 1948. La Cultura Chavín: Dos Nuevas Colonias: Kuntur Wasi y Ancón. Revista del Museo Nacional de Antropología y Arqueología, 2: 99-172, pls. 27, figs. 20. —Also issued as separate, with ill. cover, title page, and contents, paged-1-80 (p. 7 corresponding to p. 99), and two unnumbered pp. of bibliography added.

Carrión Cachot, Rebeca, 1949. Paracas: Cultural Elements. Publ. by Corporación Nacional de Turismo, Lima. pp. 1-62, Pls. 1-23 (plus col. frontispiece), figs. 1-7.

Ford, J. A., and Willey, G. R., 1940. Surface Survey of the Virú Valley, Perú. Am. Mus. Natural Hist., Anthr. Pap. 43, part. 1, pp. 1-90.

Gayton, A. H., 1927. The Uhle Collections from Nievería, in Univ. Calif. Publ. in Am. Arch. Ethriol., 21: 305-329.

Gayton, A. H., and Kroeber, A. L., 1927. The Uhle Pottery Collections from Nazca, in Univ. Calif. Publ. in Am. Arch. Ethnol., 24: 1-46.

Kroeber, A. L., 1925a. The Uhle Pottery Collections from Moche, in Univ. Calif. Publ. in Am. Arch. Ethnol., 21: 191-234.

Kroeber, A. L., 1925b. The Uhle Pottery Collections from Supe, in same, 21: 235-264.

Kroeber, A. L., 1926. The Uhle Pottery Collections from Chancay, in same, 21: 265-304.

Kroeber, A. L., 1937. Archaelogical Explorations in Perú, Pt. IV, Cañete Valley, in Field Mus. Natural Hist., Anthropology Mem., 2, N°. 4.

Kroeber, A. L., 1944. Peruvian Archaeology in 1942. Viking Fund Publ. in Anthr., N° 4.

Kroeber, A. L., and Strong, W. D., 1924a. The Uhle Collections from Chincha. in Univ. Calif. Publ. in Am. Arch. Ethnol., 21: 1-54.

Kroeber, A. L., and Strong, W. D., 1924b. The Uhle Pottery Collections from lea, in same, 21:

Larco Hoyle, R, 1941. Los Cupisniques. Lima, 259 pp.

Larco Hoyle, R., Cultura Salinar. Trujillo, 20 pp.

Larco Hoyle, R, 1948. Cronología Arqueológica del Norte del Perú. Trujillo, 87 pp.

Muelle, J. C., and Blas C., 1938. Muestrario de Arte Precolombino, en Revista del Museo Nacional, Lima, 7: 161-280.

O'Neale, Lila M., 1937. Textiles of the Early Nazca Period. Field Museum of Natural History, Anthr. Mem. II, N°. 3, pp. 121-208, pls. 32-68, 1 fig.

O'Neale, Lila M., and Kroeber, A. L., 1930. Textile Periods in Ancient Perú. Univ. Calif. Publ. Am. Ethnol., 28: 23-56.

Strong, W. D., 1925. The Uhle Pottery Collections from Ancón, in Univ. Calif. Publ. in Am. Arch. Ethnol., 21: 135-190.

Strong, W. D., Willey, G. R., and Corbett, J. M., 1943. Archeological Studies in Peru, 1941 - 42. Columbia Studies in Archeology and Ethnology. vol. 1. https://doi.org/10.7312/stro90392

Tello, J. C., 1929. Antiguo Perú; Primera Época. Lima. 183 pp., 6 pl., 115 figs.

Tello, J. C., 1943. Discovery of the Chavín Culture in Peru. Am. Antiquity, 9: 135-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/275457

Willey, G. R., 1949. "Ceramics", in Bur Am. Ethnol., Bull. 143, Handbook of South American Indians, 5: 139-294, pls. 29-40, figs. 42-63.

Willey, G. R., 1951. The Chavín Problem: a Review and Critique. Southwestern, Journ. Anthr. 7: 103-144. https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.7.2.3628619

Yacovleff, E., and Muelle, J. C., 1934. Un Fardo Funerario de Paracas. Revista del Museo Nacional. Lima, 3, N°. 1-2: 64-163.

Published
1953-06-23
How to Cite
Kroeber, A. L. (1953). Paracas Cavernas and Chavin. Letras (Lima), 19(49), 49-71. https://doi.org/10.30920/letras.19.49.3