Llegaron en sus canoa: Grammatical Innovation in Peruvian Amazonian Spanish
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30920/letras.90.131.4Abstract
This study investigates the cognitive and functional motivations behind the emergence of an innovative construction in Peruvian Amazonian Spanish. In this variety, the head of a noun phrase does not necessarilyagree in number with its modifier, when this is a possessive pronoun. Thus, noun phrases with number mismatch, such as sus canoa ‘their canoe,’ are common. A previous study found that the probabilitiesof using this innovative pattern increase when the pronoun makes anaphoric reference to multiple individuals. The present study examines exclusively contexts with multiple possessors to identify the parameters behind the alternation between concordant and discordant patterns. The variables that play a role are the gender of the speaker and the animacy of the possessor and the possessed. The use of the innovative pattern is slightly more frequent among women, and when the possessive pronoun refers to multiple entities high in animacy and the possessed noun to an entity low in animacy.Downloads
Métricas alternativas
References
Alcoff, L. & Potter, E. (1993). Feminist Epistemologies. Nueva York: Routledge.
Arrieta, T. (2016). Paradigmas de la ciencia, utopías y antiutopías. En T. Arrieta.Perfiles filosóficos (pp. 9-63). Arequipa: Editorial UNSA.
Arrieta, T. (2017). Valores tradicionales en Michel Foucault y su influencia en las epistemologías feministas. En T. Arrieta, W. Tapia, J.A. Valdivia & N. Rosado (Eds.), Actas Congreso Internacional de Filosofía de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (pp. 19-31). Arequipa: Editorial UNSA.
Blazquez Graf, N. (2011). El retorno de las brujas. Incorporación, aportaciones y críticas de las mujeres a la ciencia. Ciudad de México: UNAM, Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades.
Blazquez Graf, N. (2017). Epistemología feminista: temas centrales. En: K. da Rosa, M. Caetano & P. Almeida (Eds.), Gênero e sexualidade: interseccções necesárias ã produção de conhecimentos (pp. 12-31). Campiña Grande: Realize.
Bar On, Bat-Ami. (1993). Marginality and Epistemic Privilege. En L. Alcoff & E.
Potter. Feminist Epistemologies (pp. 83-100). Nueva York: Routledge.
Belenky. M. F. et ál. (1998). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self,voice and mind. Nueva York: Basic.
Braidotti, R. (2013). Lo posthumano. Madrid: GEDISA.
Gómez, R. (2013). El feminismo es un humanismo. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Haack, S. (1997). Evidencia e investigación. Hacia la reconstrucción en epistemología. Barcelona: Tecnos.
Haack, S. (2003). After My Own Heart. Dorothy Sayers's Feminism. En C. Pinnick, N. Koertge & R. Almeder (Eds.), Scrutinizing Feminist Epistemology (pp. 244-251). Nueva Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Haack, S. (2003a). Knowledge and Propaganda. Reflections of an Old Feminist. En C. Pinnick, Koertge & R. Almeder (Eds.), Scrutinizing Feminist Epistemology. An Examination of Gender in Science (pp. 7-29). Nueva Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Haraway, D. (1995). Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres. La reinvención de la naturaleza. Madrid: Cátedra.
Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: 'What Is Strong Objectivity'? En L. Alcoff, & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist Epistemologies (pp. 49-82). Nueva York: Routledge.
Harding, S. (1998). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Nueva York: Cornell University.
Harding, S. (2000). Sexist Metaphors in Science: 'Should the History and Philosophy of Science Be X-Rated'. En T. Schick Jr. Readings in Philosophy of Science. From Positivism to Postmodernism (pp. 218- 221). California: Mountain Blue.
Hernández, C. (2017). El dispositivo sexo-género. Guanajuato: Cátedra de Filosofía y Literatura José Revueltas.
Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: the life and work of BarbaraMcClintock. Nueva York: Freeman.
Koertge, N. (1999). na conversación con Noreta Koertge. En Daniel Greenberger,
Wolfgang L. Reiter & Anton Zeilinger (Eds.), Epistemological and Experimental Perspectives on Quantum Physics (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook #7) (pp. 279-301). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Koertge, N. (2003). Feminist Values in Science. En C. Pinnick, N. Koertge & R. Almeder (Eds.), Scrutinizing Feminist Epistemology. An Examination of Gender in Science (pp. 222-233). Nueva Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Longino, H. (1993). Subjects, Power, and Knowledge. En: L. Alcoff y E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist Epistemologies (pp. 101-120). Nueva York: Routledge.
Machiavello, N. 1960. El príncipe. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sopena.
Moyers, B. (1990). Entrevista: Bill Moyers. Evelyn Fox Keller: The Gendered Language of Science. Mayo. Recuperado de http://billmoyers.com/content/evelyn-fox-keller
Piedra, N. (2003). Feminismo y postmodernidad: entre el ser para sí o el ser para otros. Ciencias Sociales, III-IV (101-102), 43-55.
Soble, A. (2000). "In Defense of Bacon". En T. Schick, Readings in Philosophy of Science. From Positivism to Postmodernism (pp. 222-230). California: Mountain Blue.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional